Posts

Walmart’s Offshore Tax Havens Hurt Small Businesses That Support Communities

A recent report released by Americans for Tax Fairness exposed Walmart for their evasive tax practices and revealed that the retail giant is holding over 78 billion dollars in offshore subsidiaries. Our members were quick to speak out against these practices and took to the media to make their voices heard.

Matt Birong, owner of 3 Squares Café (a cute and comfortable spot in Vergennes, VT) and member of the Main Street Alliance of Vermont, compared the high road business practices of his company to the extractive economic policies of Walmart and other multinational corporations in his article, featured in The Hill.

“Small businesses like mine are being squeezed by tax policies written for the upper echelon. Even though our revenue sheets look much different than those of the retail giant, we are forced to supplement the income of their employees and absorb a larger share of the tax responsibility,” said Birong.

Kelly Conklin, a member of the Main Street Alliance national executive committee, owner of Foley-Waite cabinets in New Jersey, also weighed in on the issue and spoke about growing his business while supporting his community in his article, featured in the Augusta Free Press.

“Small businesses can’t afford an army of accountants and tax lawyers like Walmart can to create offshore tax-avoidance strategies,” said Conklin. “None of us have shell corporations in Luxembourg. Even if we could pull off such financial shenanigans, I honestly believe most of us wouldn’t want to.”

“We’d rather contribute what we should to the public good and see our communities thrive right alongside our businesses,” said Conklin.

Small business owners already face stiff competition from large corporations, like Walmart, that can execute bulk purchases and drive down prices. The latest tax evasion revelation demonstrates just how far the scales are tipped in favor of big businesses.

Congress can act to rein-in these practices – and our leaders will continue to work to make sure their voices are heard on this issue.

Bad Medicine Report Details Influence of Pharma in DC Budget Failure

Released to the Press

September 25, 2013

 

New Report Analyzes Interest Group Influence in Blocking Proposed Cost Saving Measures in Medicare

Report Finds Influence of Pharmaceutical Industry as Major Impasse to Common Sense Budget Fixes

Congress has failed to act on a commonsense, good-government approach to controlling health care costs. The significant resources the pharmaceutical industry has put toward influence and access has rendered Congress unable to act in the public interest.

Bad Medicine Report.image

 

Bad Medicine: Pharmaceuticals’ Prescription for Profits Over People, released by the Alliance for a Just Society details the overwhelming influence of Big PhRMA on congressional outcomes and finds that the imbalance created by industry spending harms both the interest of the American people and our democratic process.

Read more

CellBlocks and Border Stops

The Institute for Pragmatic Practice, Union Theological Seminary and the Alliance for a Just Society are hosting our fifth symposium,

Cell Blocks & Border Stops. Hundreds of organizers, academics, policy leaders, journalists, theologians and grassroots activists will convene and examine the intersection of immigration control and mass incarceration, and to consider the future of activism and organizing in these areas.

Today, more than seven million people are under control of the criminal justice system (prison, probation, parole or detention) exceeding the combined populations of Brooklyn, Queens, Manhattan, and Staten Island.

Eleven million immigrants-roughly the population of Ohio-are out of compliance with federal immigration law, and at constant risk for harassment, detention, and deportation.

Counting friends, families, colleagues, and neighbors, tens of millions of people today are directly affected by the sprawling immigrant control and criminal justice systems. Poor Black and Brown people have been born this burden most heavily, driven by long-standing beliefs in racial inferiority and white supremacy.

REGISTER HERE– http://bit.ly/clblocks

But these systems leave few untouched.

Join us and noted scholars and activists Cornel West and Pramila Jayapal among many other noted speakers to end the dehumanization of millions of mothers, fathers, sons and daughters by law enforcement and the criminal justice system.

[Click here for a full event Agenda.]

REGISTER here– http://bit.ly/clblocks

Women with Cancer: Prisoners’ rights versus the Profit of Corporations

sherrie

Sherrie Chapman

Rahul Gupta and Danisha Christian
Contributed to this Series

Sherrie Chapman found a lump in her breast. A prisoner in a California Corrections facility, Sherrie persisted in demanding an examination by prison medical personnel. Her pleas were not answered until 9 years later, when lumps were visibly protruding from her breast.  Even after receiving a mammogram that revealed immediate follow-up tests were needed, medical personnel denied Sherrie personnel any sort of additional testing including a biopsy, ultrasound or fine needle aspiration.

She eventually underwent two mastectomies.  Subsequently, staff ignored her chemotherapy appointments and confiscated her medication. She filed a lawsuit against the prison, received a settlement of $350,000, but sadly, at the age of 42, Sherrie died in prison from the cancer she fought so tirelessly to beat.

Her death was one of many, among other violations against women and men, which forced the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to be under federal court supervision. “In California, inmates’ health care has been under federal court supervision for the past six years after a judge found that the state failed to provide inmates with adequate medical treatment. Read more

Inadequate Healthcare in Prisons: A Death Penalty Conviction for Profit (3-Part Examination)

Danisha Christian and Rahul Gupta contributed to this series

“In the last ten years alone, there have been instances of medical neglect, sexual abuse, and preventable suicide in private facilities [throughout the state], said Bob Libal, Director of Grassroots Leadership. Libal and others are part of the Texas Civil Rights Project and Prison Legal News lawsuit against Corrections Corporation of America. CCA is one of the top two private prison companies in the country.

Private prisons throughout the country have faced charges from family members and advocates, alleging the wrongful death of inmates whose medical conditions were not only treatable, but routine and preventable. While many of the cases included in this article point to the state of Texas—that state is not an outlier, but part of the norm. Read more

The Great Big PhRMA Medicare Heist

Part 1: Rigging the System is Profitable

 

While millions of Americans struggle to pay for their prescription medication, big pharmaceutical companies reap $600 billion in annual profits.  $116 million is spent on direct lobbying, and with a 77,500% return, the investment certainly pays off.  Profits have been bolstered by pharmaceutical companies’ myriad of policy wins.  A well-funded barrage from lobbyists has created patent protections, limiting competition from lower-cost drug options, and, not surprisingly, price protections built into federal policies.  By comparison, when you look at the return of individual investors, multinationals, and the oil industry, we see a stark contrast:

 

The Amazing ROI of Corporate Lobbying
by JLMC.
Explore more infographics like this one on the web’s largest information design community – Visually.

 

 

Senior citizens–without blue chip stocks, without millions in expendable liquidity for political campaign contributions–average a meager salary of $22,000. The influence of money has certainly trumped the voices of the citizenry in the halls of Congress. Just look at the recent collapse of a federal gun violence bill and the influence of the gun owner lobby over the cries of the general public.

An income of $22,000 a year is hardly a fighting chance against the lobbying power of Big Pharma.  Many seniors struggle to pay for food, rent, and heat, let alone afford the sticker price on their medicines.  Drug companies, meanwhile, can spend billions in campaign contributions, PR, and advertising to ensure that their voices are heard over those of ordinary Americans.

And it certainly has been. The industry owns the story being told in Washington DC and the mainstream media.  (We tell a different version at hookedonpharma.com)

The tale that big drug companies have successfully spun is one of despair, hardship, and weak patent laws that no longer serve to protect the financial gains of private enterprise.  It runs like this: pharmaceutical companies are American institutions.  They produce life-saving drugs.  This innovation takes a lot of time and costs a lot of money.  Prices are set where they are for a reason, and people who use these drugs should pay for them.  Generic manufacturers are already able to take away name-brand profits when patents run out.  If you take away the “free market” structure of programs like Medicare Part D, pharmaceutical companies will collapse.  It is in the nation’s best interest to leave price controls in place to preserve a “life-saving” American institution.

The story is horribly fatalistic, and geared to churn the better nature in all of us.  And when told by pharmaceutical industry lobbyists who outnumber members of Congress 2:1, the narrative has taken parable status in recent years.  By targeting hundreds of millions of dollars on key members and committees, pharmaceutical companies have gotten their way in the majority of almost 1500 bills in the past eight years.

Medicare Part D is no exception.

Congress passed Medicare Part D, a prescription drug “benefit” program for seniors, in 2003.  This may initially sound like a blessing for seniors, but, among other pitfalls, the bill prevented Congress from negotiating drug prices under Medicare.  Instead of ensuring that Medicare Insetparticipants can afford prescription medication, the legislation made certain that pharmaceutical companies could maximize profits.  Immediately following the passage of the legislation that saw $116 million in lobbyist strong-arming, the same companies increased prescription prices and saw profits skyrocket.  America’s seniors are footing that bill in part through the Medicare Part D “doughnut hole,” a period when Medicare stops paying for prescriptions and the individual must pick up the “market-rate price” for their medicines.

The so-called free-market drumbeaters would have the country believe that any negotiation amounts to government intervention in the market. What they are saying is that they don’t want American citizens and taxpayers to be able to negotiate a better contract with the pharmaceutical industry.

They have created a Free Market Red Herring in the process.

 

 

 

 

 

Part 2: The Free Market Red Herring

MedicarePartDprofits

When in doubt the opposition cries free market foul play. Part D was engineered and pushed through by companies, not American taxpayers. The clause against allowing negotiated prices was the one piece that held higher-than-market prices in place, thereby guaranteeing a direct flow of taxpayer dollars into the profit columns of the industry.

What business would accept contracts term like these? “I am offering you a horrible deal, ensuring you lose on every transaction. You’ll take it and there’s nothing you can do about it.”

None.

So now what?

Screaming “monopoly” doesn’t work here: patent holders are conveniently protected against anti-trust proceedings.  And technically, there are a lot of pharmaceutical and biotech companies throughout the country so consolidation can’t be used as a factor either.  But when competitors collude to rig a piece of legislation so that there is no recourse or correction, the nation has a problem.  Or so they would have the nation believe.

The fact is, there are commonsense solutions Congress can enact right now, and ones that will save benefits for seniors, cut costs for taxpayers, and do little to hurt the profits of Big Pharma, despite their rhetoric.

Under the Medicare Drug Savings Act introduced by Senator Rockefeller of West Virginia, Medicare could save $140 billion over 10 years. Some analysts estimate that the nation would recover between 2% and 7% of the subsidized profits if Congress required drug-pricing negotiations in Medicare.

Pharmaceutical profits jumped nearly overnight after Medicare Part D was enacted in 2006.  And since 2005, big drug companies have seen an almost 50% increase in profits.  Big Pharma has successfully scared the public into believing their profits are necessary for the common good.  Yet, while profits continue to skyrocket, and drug prices have significantly outpaced inflation, Big Pharma drug innovation is on the decline.  In fact, studies indicate that taxpayers, not pharmaceutical companies, are funding most of the research leading to major medical breakthroughs.  Sounds like Americans can afford to miss out on the same allergy medicine in a different color and another t.v. commercial.  But apparently $552 billion in remaining profits and a 50% tax write off for research and development expenses are just not enough to motivate someone to help sick people.

Instead of being concerned with Big Pharma profit margins, Congress needs to ensure that seniors receiving Medicare get the best quality and most affordable healthcare they can receive. Medicare Part D is not a comprehensive solution, but is certainly a bad policy and one that was enacted under the collective boot of 1,100 Big Pharma lobbyists, constructed to pad the pockets of the drug industry. It’s time to make a change.  Congress can and should make Medicare drug coverage work for people, not Pharma.

 

 

Part 3: Setting People-First Policy Priorities

Bad Prescription

Admittedly, funding healthcare requires prioritizing.  But the priorities are simple.  Congress can prioritize the senior, who needs prescription medication to survive.  Congress can at the same time prioritize taxpayers, saving them billions.  Or, Congress can prioritize the big pharmaceutical companies:  companies that spend more paying lawsuit settlements and penalties than they stand to lose in profits if Congress allowed Medicare to negotiate drug prices.

This system of negotiations is not just an abstract concept with theoretical implications.  Its success has been shown in numerous organizations and other countries.  For example, the Veteran’s Administration (which negotiates prices with pharmaceuticals) is able to obtain the top 10 drugs covered by the plan at a price 48% lower (on average) than Medicare.  Other wealthy nations that negotiate pharmaceutical prices pay 150% to 300% less than Medicare.

It seems clear that Congress, by refusing to save seniors and the average American taxpayer money, worries more about profits than the people it was elected to represent.

The Alliance for a Just Society affiliates met in Washington, D.C. to address their Congressional leaders in the Senate and drive home the need for senior-first policies and to prioritize freeing Medicare to negotiate prescription drug prices.  To bolster the voices of these delegates representing 20 states, the Alliance delivered a national petition, signed by 350 organizations, dozens of legislators, and nearly 8,000 Americans, to the Senate.  The simple demand: allow Medicare to negotiate prescription drug prices. Unfortunately, the bill introduced by Senator Rockefeller has yet to make it past congressional committee, where many good bills go to die.  This is where Americans should renew their efforts: get the bill out of committee, and give the Senate a chance to vote.

Republicans and Democrats may not agree on much, but both sides of the aisle can agree that a good government considers the needs of its citizens.  A good government allows individuals to thrive.  So many seniors have worked the majority of their lives to provide for themselves, their family, and the prosperity of the nation.  Now is not the time to turn our backs on them and to profit off their illnesses. It is time to make it possible for all Americans to retire with dignity.

 

 

 

 

Tax Havens for Big Business? Small Business Owners Say ‘Not so fast’

Multi-Partisan small business owners spoke out earlier this month, further distinguishing their interests from those of Big Business.

Wednesday, in his post “Has the Budget Crisis Du Jour Got You Down?” Bill Daley pointed out that if Congress were to close one tax loophole on offshore accounts, it could be enough to create a ‘job stimulus’ program the country has not seen since the beginning of the Great Recession. Read more

Daley’s View: Whatever Happened to the Rule of Law?

Many years ago I heard with bemusement that Mafia like organizations were springing up in Russia following the collapse of Communism. The reports suggested that these associations were emerging because their organizers thought that Capitalism actually sanctioned criminal behavior and they were only following the new rules. Read more